01
Institutional commitments
The positions Hii chooses to hold, including relational literacy, human agency, non-pathologizing interpretation, continuity awareness, and accountable human judgment.
Architecture
Evidence and Architecture Crosswalk
A structured map connecting what Hii is committed to with what has been directly observed, supported by literature, provisionally interpreted, left open, or not yet ready for publication.
Status: Working synthesis. This page is the public overview.
Purpose
Architecture should not silently become evidence.
Hii has a clear institutional purpose, but purpose alone does not establish a research finding. The crosswalk keeps mission, observation, literature, interpretation, uncertainty, and publication sequence visible as different layers.
The Crosswalk
Seven layers, kept distinct and connected.
02
Direct observations
What can be documented in the archive, pilot work, public systems, interviews, or other inspectable records without extending beyond the observation itself.
03
Literature signals
Findings and frameworks from existing research that support, complicate, or challenge Hii's emerging questions.
04
Provisional interpretations
Explanations that may organize the evidence but remain open to alternatives, correction, and stronger testing.
05
Research questions
Questions that can be translated into measures, comparison conditions, coding schemes, perturbations, interviews, or longitudinal study designs.
06
Evidence gaps
Missing comparison groups, incomplete verification, weak provenance, untested mechanisms, absent external review, and other limits that constrain a claim.
07
Publication gates
The conditions that determine whether an output is ready for public explanation, working-paper release, pilot use, external review, or archive-quality publication.
Publication Sequence
Low-risk translation can move before high-claim research.
Publish what can already be explained responsibly
Plain-language education, terminology, clinician orientation, and research questions can be useful without being presented as settled findings.
Convert interpretation into research design
Candidate phenomena should become measurable constructs, explicit alternatives, falsification conditions, and prospective protocols.
Strengthen the evidence trail
Source-level verification, independent coding, provenance, contradiction tracking, and revision history determine how far a claim can travel.
Match the publication to the evidence
Public-facing language should reflect whether an output is an institutional position, working synthesis, methods paper, pilot result, or validated finding.
How It Is Used
The crosswalk is a decision system, not a static diagram.
Research
Claim discipline
Every major output can be checked for fit with Hii architecture, evidence status, known gaps, and the next method required.
Public communication
Audience boundaries
The same idea may need different wording for a research paper, clinician seminar, public explainer, policy discussion, or internal working document.
Boundary
The crosswalk does not revise Hii's architecture.
It makes the existing architecture inspectable so each research, educational, and publication output can be tested for fit. New evidence may strengthen, narrow, complicate, or challenge a commitment, but it should not be allowed to change categories silently.