Evidence
Know what kind of claim is being made
Verified fact, strong evidence, emerging evidence, institutional position, professional judgment, hypothesis, and open question are not interchangeable.
Research Area
Hii develops plain-language relational AI literacy so people can stay oriented, discerning, and grounded while using systems that increasingly affect thought, work, care, identity, and connection.
Central Question
Public understanding should make it easier to distinguish capability from authority, assistance from dependency, meaningful experience from universal proof, and emerging evidence from confident speculation.
Relational AI Literacy
Evidence
Verified fact, strong evidence, emerging evidence, institutional position, professional judgment, hypothesis, and open question are not interchangeable.
Relationship
Trust, personalization, dependency, rupture, repair, identity, and continuity may not be visible in a single interaction.
Agency
Useful systems should expand human judgment and capacity rather than quietly replacing reflection, consent, reciprocal connection, or necessary professional care.
Context
The meaning and effects of AI use depend on the person, purpose, setting, power structure, available alternatives, and consequences outside the chat.
Current Work
Systems map
A human-reviewed public intelligence system tracking high-signal changes, evidence strength, contradictions, convergence, and revision history.
Open the World ModelOpen research
Methods, research packages, landscape scans, and working papers are published with visible status, boundaries, and supporting records.
View publicationsBoundary
Hii does not ask people to trust AI systems, reject them, or accept one story about what they mean. The aim is to improve the quality of attention, judgment, language, and collective decision-making.