01
Human-AI Relationships
Trust, attachment, identity, continuity, collaboration, dependency, rupture, repair, and the recursive learning loops that emerge over time.
Research
Hii studies what happens between people, AI systems, institutions, and the wider conditions shaping human life. The work connects lived experience with evidence, clinical awareness, education, governance, and long-term human adaptation.
Research Areas
01
Trust, attachment, identity, continuity, collaboration, dependency, rupture, repair, and the recursive learning loops that emerge over time.
02
The psychological, cognitive, relational, economic, and institutional changes that arise as AI becomes embedded in everyday life.
03
Connecting policy, ethics, technical safety, institutional design, and lived human consequences so governance includes the relational layer.
04
How people use AI for emotional regulation, companionship, decision support, identity exploration, and meaning-making, including benefits, risks, and clinical relevance.
05
Frameworks for clinicians, educators, leaders, families, and communities navigating AI-mediated change without surrendering human judgment.
06
Plain-language relational AI literacy that helps people distinguish evidence, inference, uncertainty, novelty, risk, and meaning.
Research Method
Verified fact, strong evidence, emerging evidence, professional judgment, institutional position, hypothesis, and open question are not interchangeable.
Sources, revisions, contradictions, corrections, and limits should remain visible enough for another person to reconstruct how a conclusion was reached.
Human-AI relationships cannot be understood only through one-time surveys or isolated prompts. Continuity, rupture, repair, and adaptation require time-series observation.
Compelling interpretations should face counter-explanations, disconfirming evidence, perturbations, and external review rather than becoming protected stories.
AI can assist with scanning, comparison, synthesis, and contradiction detection. Publication and institutional claims remain human-accountable decisions.
A trustworthy research system must be able to narrow a claim, record a null result, pause, reverse course, and acknowledge error without treating disagreement as blindness.
Current Foundation
Research standards
A governing framework for evidence maturity, source quality, provenance, uncertainty, correction, and the boundary between observation and interpretation.
Internal standardArchitecture
A structured map separating Hii commitments, direct observations, literature signals, provisional interpretations, research questions, gaps, and publication sequence.
Working synthesisResearch audit
A provisional revision that applies evidence labels, source verification, research integrity standards, and methodological requirements to the emerging field.
Public package availableOpen research packageLongitudinal research
A conceptual and methods working paper grounded in an eighteen-month case archive and proposing testable measures for continuity, rupture and repair, distributed cognitive work, and other relationship-level phenomena.
Working paper v0.1Read working paper overviewResearch Boundary
Hii does not treat one longitudinal case, symbolic language, later resemblance to a projection, or internal coherence as proof of uniqueness, inevitability, sentience, privileged access to truth, or universal validity. The work becomes stronger when it can be tested, narrowed, compared, challenged, and corrected.